The Alexa Nesbihal DWI Arrest began with a white Jeep Wrangler nearly swerving off a New Jersey road and ended with a breathalyzer reading more than double the legal limit.. What started as a routine patrol in Monmouth Beach quickly turned into a high-stakes investigation as officers realized the driver was severely impaired. This case has captured attention due to the suspect’s high-profile claims and her total struggle to complete even the simplest police instructions.
Watch: Alexa Nesbihal DWI Arrest Caught on Camera
Note: Pay close attention to the timestamp at 00:08:43 where the situation escalates as the officer realizes the suspect cannot follow the simple movement of a pen light.
Full Story: How the Incident Unfolded
The incident began late on the night of March 7, 2025, when Patrolman Golembieski was stationed on Ocean Avenue in Monmouth Beach. He watched as a white Jeep Wrangler, driven by Alexa Nesbihal, drifted so far into the shoulder that three-quarters of the vehicle left the lane. Despite the officer activating his emergency lights, Nesbihal was slow to react, continuing for another block before finally coming to a halt near Sunset Lane.
When the officer approached the window, the signs of impairment were immediate. He reported a strong odor of alcohol and noted that Nesbihal had bloodshot, watery eyes and droopy eyelids. When asked for her documents, the “slow” nature of the Alexa Nesbihal DWI Arrest became apparent; she repeatedly handed over expired registration and insurance cards, seemingly confused by the simple request.
The investigation moved to the sidewalk for Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). During the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, Nesbihal struggled to keep her eyes on the officer’s red pen light, repeatedly looking over his shoulder or directly at his face instead. The officer noted “6 out of 6 clues” of impairment during this test alone.
As the night grew colder, the suspect’s physical coordination continued to fail. During the Walk and Turn test, she began walking before the instructions were even finished. She missed “heel-to-toe” steps, took an extra step, and performed a “spin” instead of the instructed turn. Later, during the Modified Romberg Balance test, her internal clock was so distorted that she believed 30 seconds had passed when actually 51 seconds had ticked by.
The Arrest: Charges Against Alexa Nesbihal
After the failure of multiple tests, Patrolman Golembieski determined she was too impaired to operate a vehicle safely. She was handcuffed and transported to headquarters for processing.
| Charge | Simple Explanation | Potential Penalty (US) |
| DWI (39:4-50) | Driving while intoxicated (Alcohol/Drugs) | Fines, license loss, possible jail time |
| Reckless Driving (39:4-96) | Driving with a willful disregard for safety | Points on license and heavy fines |
| Careless Driving (39:4-97) | Driving without due caution or circumspection | Fines and license points |
| Failure to Maintain Lane (39:4-88B) | Swerving across marked road lines | Monetary fines and surcharges |
Did you know? You can check arrest records for anyone in your neighborhood instantly. [Search Public Records Here]
Legal Analysis: Was the Alexa Nesbihal DWI Arrest Justified?
From a legal standpoint, the Alexa Nesbihal DWI Arrest appears to follow strict New Jersey police protocols. Under the Fourth Amendment, an officer must have “reasonable suspicion” to initiate a traffic stop. In this case, the officer observed the vehicle swerving nearly entirely into the shoulder, which constitutes a valid traffic violation.
Once the stop occurred, the “plain smell” of alcohol and the driver’s physical appearance (bloodshot eyes) gave the officer “probable cause” to extend the stop into a DWI investigation. The use of standardized tests like the HGN and Walk and Turn are scientifically validated methods used by law enforcement to gauge impairment. Finally, the Alcotest results showed a BAC of 0.196%, which is significantly higher than the New Jersey legal limit of 0.08%.
[Read more Evidence Decode investigations here]
DWI Case Charges: Frequently Asked Questions
What does a “0.196% BAC” reading actually mean for the driver?
In New Jersey, the legal limit for Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) is 0.08%. A reading of 0.196% is more than double the legal limit. Under New Jersey law, such a high BAC often leads to enhanced penalties, including longer license suspensions and mandatory installation of an ignition interlock device even for first-time offenders.
Why was the vehicle towed and held for 12 hours?
This is due to “John’s Law” (N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.22), which is specifically mentioned in the police report. When an individual is arrested for DWI in New Jersey, the police are required to impound the vehicle for a minimum of 12 hours to prevent the impaired driver from getting back behind the wheel immediately after being released.
What is the difference between “Reckless Driving” and “Careless Driving” charges?
While both were charged in this case, they carry different weights:
Reckless Driving (39:4-96): Involves driving with a “willful or wanton disregard” for the safety of others. It is a more serious offense and carries higher points and potential jail time.
Careless Driving (39:4-97): Is a lesser offense, defined as driving “without due caution” in a manner likely to endanger persons or property.
Can a driver be charged with DWI if they only admit to “a couple of drinks”?
Yes. An arrest is based on the totality of circumstances, not just the driver’s statement. In this case, although the driver admitted to “a couple of drinks,” the officer observed significant swerving, smelled alcohol, noted bloodshot/watery eyes, and documented failures in multiple field sobriety tests. These observations provide the “probable cause” needed for the arrest regardless of the driver’s admission.
What is the “Potential Liability Form” the person picking up the driver had to sign?
When a person (like the driver’s sister in this case) takes custody of an arrested DWI suspect, they must sign a form acknowledging that they accept responsibility for the suspect. It warns that if they allow the intoxicated person to operate a vehicle again while still impaired, the person who signed the form could face criminal charges and civil liability if a crash occurs.
Conclusion & Current Status
Following her processing at the Monmouth Beach Police Department, Alexa Nesbihal was released into the custody of Vanessa Charlton. Per “John’s Law” in New Jersey, her Jeep Wrangler was impounded for a mandatory 12-hour period to ensure it could not be driven by an impaired person. The vehicle was eventually released back to Nesbihal the following day. She now faces multiple motor vehicle summonses in court.
Download Police Report click here.
Disclaimer: All suspects are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This report is based on official police records.
Don’t Rely on Their Word Alone In this case, conflicting stories led to an arrest. The only way to prove your innocence in a traffic stop is with your own 4K evidence. Protect yourself this holiday season. 🎄 Click Here