Short Hills, NJ — A routine shopping trip turned into a viral Short Hills Mall shoplifting arrest when police confronted a woman accused of walking out of a high-end store with designer sunglasses literally sitting on top of her head.
The incident, which took place at the upscale Short Hills Mall, highlights how quickly a “memory lapse” can turn into a criminal record. Officers from the Millburn Police Department responded to a call from Sunglass Hut, leading to a tense confrontation inside another store that was captured on body camera.
This report breaks down the minute-by-minute details of the investigation, the suspect’s stunned reaction, and the precise moment the Short Hills Mall shoplifting arrest unfolded.
Table of Contents
Watch: Short Hills Mall Shoplifting Arrest Caught on Camera
Note: Pay close attention to the timestamp at 00:11:50 in the transcript. This is the exact moment officers make contact and the suspect realizes she is not going home.
Full Story: How the Incident Unfolded
The incident began on a Saturday afternoon, March 18, 2023, just before 5:00 PM. Officer Lester Manuyag of the Millburn Police Department was dispatched to the Sunglass Hut located on the lower level of the mall.
The Initial Report
Upon arrival, Officer Manuyag interviewed the store’s sales associate, Jade Toussaint. Toussaint provided a clear description of the events. She stated that a female suspect entered the store wearing an all-black outfit and a black baseball cap.
According to the police report, the woman selected multiple pairs of sunglasses to try on. She eventually picked up a pair of white Versace sunglasses.
The associate reported that the woman held the Versace glasses in her hand while continuing to browse. Crucially, the suspect then allegedly placed the white Versace sunglasses in her pocket or sleeve while returning a different pair to the shelf.
The situation escalated when the woman left the store, passing all points of sale without making any attempt to pay for the designer eyewear, valued at $345.00.
The Search
Police launched an immediate search of the mall. Security officers and dispatch played a vital role, using CCTV footage to track the suspect’s movements.
The search was complicated by the crowds, but officers had distinct descriptors. In the bodycam audio, officers can be heard focusing on specific details of the suspect’s attire to cut through the noise.
“The sneakers are pretty distinct,” one officer noted, identifying a key visual clue.
They also looked for “black leather” clothing and “blonde highlights” in the suspect’s hair. The coordination was precise. Officers Manuyag, Jezewski, and Bifano moved through the corridors, communicating via radio to close the net.
Security eventually spotted the woman, later identified as 51-year-old Maria Elena Lobo, entering the Vineyard Vines store.
The Confrontation: “What Did I Did?”
The climax of the Short Hills Mall shoplifting arrest occurred inside Vineyard Vines. Officers approached Lobo after she had completed a transaction there.
The Evidence in Plain Sight
When police stopped Lobo, they didn’t have to search far for the stolen property. The police report notes a damning detail: “Located on her head was a white Versace sunglasses matching the stolen item from Sunglass Hut”.
Despite the eyewear sitting visibly on her head, the interaction turned chaotic immediately.
“You’re being placed under arrest for shoplifting,” the officer announced firmly.
Lobo’s reaction was one of immediate shock and denial.
“Oh my God! What did I did?” she exclaimed.
The Denial
The officer cut through the confusion instantly. “You shoplifted… Turn around, you’re under arrest,” he ordered.
Lobo continued to protest as she was handcuffed. “I didn’t stole,” she pleaded.
When the officer pointed out the evidence—”Where the glasses come from on top of your head”—Lobo offered a defense common in shoplifting cases.
“I was just trying, but I didn’t stole it… I didn’t know that I had it on my head,” she claimed.
She insisted it was an accident, stating, “I just tried it on… I’m so embarrassed”.
Despite her pleas to “go back to the mall” or resolve the issue another way, officers followed protocol strictly. She was read her Miranda rights and escorted to a patrol car.
The Arrest: Charges Against Maria Elena Lobo
Following the detention, Maria Elena Lobo was transported to Millburn Police Headquarters for processing. A search was conducted, which came back negative for any other contraband.
The following table outlines the specific charge filed against the suspect.
| Charge | Simple Explanation | Potential Penalty (US Context) |
| N.J.S.A. 2C:20-11B(2) | Shoplifting (Concealment): Purposely concealing merchandise with the intention of depriving the merchant of its full value. | In New Jersey, shoplifting items worth between $200 and $500 is a fourth-degree crime, potentially punishable by up to 18 months in jail and fines. |
The total value of the stolen property was listed as $345.00. Because the value exceeds $200, the severity of the charge increases under New Jersey law.
Legal Analysis: Was the Short Hills Mall Shoplifting Arrest Justified?
As an investigative journalist looking at the Short Hills Mall shoplifting arrest, the actions of the officers appear to align with standard legal protocols for a “Terry Stop” and subsequent arrest.
1. Probable Cause
For an arrest to be legal, police must have probable cause. In this case, the probable cause was established through three key elements:
- Witness Statement: The sales associate, Jade Toussaint, provided a direct account of the suspect concealing the item and leaving without paying.
- CCTV Corroboration: Mall security tracked the suspect via camera, confirming her location and description.
- Plain View Doctrine: When officers approached Lobo, the stolen item (white Versace sunglasses) was visible on her person (her head). This allows officers to seize evidence without a warrant if it is clearly visible in a public place.
2. The “Intent” Factor
Shoplifting charges often hinge on “intent.” Lobo claimed she “forgot” the glasses were on her head. However, under the law, intent can be inferred from actions.
The police report alleges she placed the glasses in her “pocket/sleeve” before leaving the store. Moving merchandise into a pocket and then walking past points of sale creates a strong presumption of intent to steal. The fact that they were later found on her head does not negate the initial act of concealment or removal from the premises reported by the witness.
3. Miranda Rights
The bodycam transcript confirms that officers read Lobo her Miranda rights immediately upon arrest. “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law,” the officer recited.
This indicates that procedural due process was followed during the detainment.
[Read more Evidence Decode investigations here]
5 FAQs in English that are connected to the charges and legal concepts found in this case
Can I be charged with shoplifting if I “accidentally” walk out with an item?
Yes, you can still be charged. While shoplifting laws generally require “intent” to steal, police and prosecutors often look at your actions to prove that intent. In this case, the suspect claimed she “forgot” the sunglasses were on her head. However, because she allegedly concealed them earlier and walked past all points of sale without paying, police determined there was probable cause to arrest her for shoplifting.
How does the value of the stolen item affect the charges in New Jersey?
The value of the merchandise significantly changes the severity of the crime. In this incident, the police report classified the offense as “Theft, Over $200”. Under New Jersey law (referenced as NJ Statute 2C:20-11B in the report ), stealing items valued between $200 and $500 is typically a fourth-degree crime, which carries harsher potential penalties than stealing low-value items (which is a disorderly persons offense).
What does “Released on Own Recognizance” (ROR) mean?
Being “released on your own recognizance” means the suspect is allowed to leave police custody without having to pay cash bail or a bond. They simply sign a promise to appear in court on their scheduled date. In this case, after being processed at headquarters, the suspect was released on her own recognizance pending her court appearance at Veterans Courthouse.
If the police don’t read me my rights immediately, is the case dismissed?
No, a case is not automatically dismissed just because Miranda rights weren’t read instantly. Miranda warnings are required before custodial interrogation (questioning you while you are in custody). In this footage, the officer read the suspect her rights (“You have the right to remain silent…”) after she was handcuffed but before formally questioning her at the station. Evidence collected before that—like the sunglasses sitting plainly on her head—is usually still admissible.
What is the difference between “Concealment” and regular Shoplifting?
“Concealment” is a specific type of shoplifting where a person hides merchandise (in a pocket, bag, or clothes) to deprive the store of its value, even if they haven’t left the store yet. In this report, the witness stated the suspect placed the sunglasses in her “pocket/sleeve”. This act of hiding the item can be enough for a charge, as it demonstrates the intent to steal before the suspect even walks out the door.
Conclusion & Current Status
Maria Elena Lobo was processed at headquarters and checked against criminal databases (NCIC, ACS, ATS), which returned negative for active warrants.
She was released on her own recognizance (meaning she did not have to pay bail) and was issued Summons S-2023-94.
Current Status:
- Suspect: Released.
- Court Date: Scheduled for May 10, 2023, at 09:00 hours at Veterans Courthouse.
- Item: The Versace sunglasses were recovered and returned to Sunglass Hut.
This Short Hills Mall shoplifting arrest serves as a stark reminder: store security and police coordination are faster and more effective than many realize. What a suspect calls a “memory lapse,” the law calls theft.
Download Police Report click here.
Disclaimer: All suspects are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This report is based on official police records.
Don’t Rely on Their Word Alone In this case, conflicting stories led to an arrest. The only way to prove your innocence in a traffic stop is with your own 4K evidence. Protect yourself this holiday season. 🎄 Click Here